基于小波分析的圖像稀疏保真度評(píng)價(jià)
doi: 10.11999/JEIT150173 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT150173
基金項(xiàng)目:
國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(60975008)和重慶市教委科學(xué)技術(shù)研究項(xiàng)目(KJ1400434)
Sparse Image Fidelity Evaluation Based on Wavelet Analysis
-
摘要: 該文針對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的圖像質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)方法無(wú)法有效模擬人類(lèi)視覺(jué)系統(tǒng)(HVS)存在的不足,提出基于小波分析的加權(quán)稀疏保真度(Weighting Sparse Fidelity, WSF)圖像評(píng)價(jià)算法。算法以模擬人類(lèi)視覺(jué)系統(tǒng)的神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)為切入點(diǎn),對(duì)圖像進(jìn)行一階小波分解得到4個(gè)不同方向的子帶圖像,然后將子帶圖像分成88大小的圖像塊,采用快速獨(dú)立分量分析(FastICA)的方法對(duì)各個(gè)圖像塊進(jìn)行訓(xùn)練并提取圖像特征檢測(cè)矩陣,根據(jù)特征檢測(cè)矩陣計(jì)算各子帶圖像塊的稀疏特征值并建立稀疏保真度質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)模型。在此基礎(chǔ)上,根據(jù)細(xì)節(jié)信息的不同對(duì)低頻子帶圖像進(jìn)行區(qū)間劃分并設(shè)置視覺(jué)權(quán)重,使之更加接近人眼的主觀視覺(jué)。實(shí)驗(yàn)中對(duì)LIVE庫(kù)中所有圖像進(jìn)行算法驗(yàn)證,其結(jié)果表明,所提方法能很好地對(duì)各種失真類(lèi)型的圖像進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。基于小波分析的稀疏保真度評(píng)價(jià)算法能夠有效模擬人類(lèi)視覺(jué)系統(tǒng)的多頻特性和視覺(jué)皮層感知機(jī)制,彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有圖像質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)方法在此方面的不足。
-
關(guān)鍵詞:
- 圖像質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià) /
- 稀疏保真度 /
- 獨(dú)立分量分析 /
- 視覺(jué)加權(quán) /
- 主客觀一致性
Abstract: To overcome the limitations of traditional image quality assessment methods, which are not well consistent with subjective human evaluation, a quality assessment algorithm of Weighting Sparse Fidelity (WSF) based on wavelet analysis is proposed. The arithmetic simulates nerve network of Human Vision System (HVS) as research point, the image is decomposed with wavelet into four-sub band images, which are divided into blocks at size of , then using Fast Independent Component Analysis training (FastICA) method to train the image blocks. Then, each image block sparse character matrix is extracted to calculate the sparse feature fidelity of the image and build the sparse fidelity quality evaluation model. On this basis, the image is divided into a plurality of interval according to the different details of the visual image information and a visual weight is set in each section, which can be consistent with subjective human evaluation. The experiment results on LIVE database show that the proposed method has a good evaluation of all kinds of distortion types and is highly consistent with human subjective evaluations. The proposed algorithm can effectively simulate the weighted visual cortex of the human visual system perception mechanisms, which compensates for deficiencies of existing image quality assessment methods. -
蔣剛毅, 黃大江, 王旭, 等. 圖像質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)方法研究進(jìn)展[J]. 電子與信息學(xué)報(bào), 2010, 32(1): 219-226. Jiang Gang-yi, Huang Da-jiang, Wang Xu, et al.. Overview on image quality assessment methods[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2010, 32(1): 219-226. 陳勇, 李愿, 呂霞付, 等. 視覺(jué)感知的彩色圖像質(zhì)量積極評(píng)價(jià)[J]. 光學(xué)精密工程, 2013, 21(3): 742-750. Chen Yong, Li Yuan, L Xia-fu, et al.. Active assessment of color image quality based on visual perception[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2013, 21(3): 742-750. 郭迎春, 于明, 朱秋明. 基于子帶相似性分析的 JPEG2000 圖像無(wú)參考質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)[J]. 電子與信息學(xué)報(bào), 2011, 33(6): 1496-1500. Guo Ying-chun, Yu Ming, and Zhu Qiu-ming. No reference image quality assessment based on subbands similarity and statistical analysis for JPEG2000[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2011, 33(6): 1496-1500. Vu P V and Chandler D M. A fast wavelet-based algorithm for global and local image sharpness estimation[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2012, 19(7): 423-426. Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, et al.. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600-612. Sheikh H R and Bovik A C. Image information and visual quality[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(2): 430-444. Li C and Bovik A C. Content-partitioned structural similarity index for image quality assessment[J]. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2010, 25(7): 517-526. Zhang L, Zhang D, and Mou X. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2011, 20(8): 2378-2386. 李柯蒙, 邵楓, 蔣剛毅, 等. 基于稀疏表示的立體圖像客觀質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)方法[J]. 光電子激光, 2014, 25(11): 2227-2233. Li Ke-meng, Shao Feng, Jiang Gang-yi, et al.. An objective quality assessment of stereoscopic image based on sparse representation[J]. Journal of OptoelectronicsLaser, 2014, 25(11): 2227-2233. Bell A J and Sejnowski T J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution[J]. Neural Computation, 1995, 7(6): 1129-1159. Saad M A and Bovik A C. Natural motion statistics for no-reference video quality assessment[C]. IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, San Diego, CA, USA, 2009: 163-167. Chang H W, Yang H, Gan Y, et al.. Sparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2013, 22(10): 4007-4018. VQEG. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment [OL]. ftp://ftp.its.bldrdoc.gov/dist/ituvidq/Boulder_VQEG _jan_04/VQEG_PhaseII_FRTV_Final_Report_SG9060 E.doc, 2003. Chandler D M and Hemami S S. VSNR: a wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2007, 16(9): 2284-2298. Sheikh H R, Bovik A C, and De Veciana G. An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2005, 14(12): 2117-2128. -
計(jì)量
- 文章訪問(wèn)數(shù): 1555
- HTML全文瀏覽量: 128
- PDF下載量: 306
- 被引次數(shù): 0